Blog Layout

Home Prices are Held Down by Covid-19 in Big Cities While Climbing Sharply in Less Crowded Areas

Didier Malagies • October 13, 2020

Home Prices Are Held Down by Covid-19 in Big Cities While Climbing Sharply in Less Crowded Areas


       

       

    Avery McGowan posted in

   Housing in Housing News

     

  Home Prices Are Held Down by COVID-19 in Big Cities While Climbing Sharply in Less Crowded Areas

   

       

  Source: USA Today Written by: Paul Davidson

  The housing market has been booming during the COVID-19 crisis, but America’s cities are taking it on the chin.


And while big cities like New York and San Francisco, in particular, are struggling with falling prices, values in less densely populated cities such as Phoenix and Charlotte, North Carolina, are holding up fairly well, a new analysis shows.


The study underscores that the spread of the virus and the trend toward remote work are driving the housing market, and may continue to restrain price growth in very crowded urban areas while boosting gains in more suburban areas for some time.


Since the virus began to take a significant toll on public health and the economy in March, many Americans have been fleeing cities for suburban and rural areas both to minimize the risk of contagion and take advantage of remote work policies during the crisis, says economist Troy Ludtka of Natixis, an investment banking firm. Those factors, he says, have bolstered home sales. Analysts believe the teleworking shift will at least partly continue even after the outbreak is over.


Also, many Americans, who are still spending an inordinate share of their days at home despite gradual business reopenings, are hunting for houses with more indoor and outdoor space, according to Redfin, a national real estate brokerage.


Also underpinning strong sales are historically low mortgage rates, says Todd Teta, chief product officer for ATTOM Data Solutions, a real estate research firm.


In the four weeks ending Sept. 20, home sales were up 13.6% annually in U.S. suburbs, 13% in rural areas and 8.8% in urban areas, according to a Redfin study. Home prices rose 16.6% in rural areas, 13.7% in the suburbs and 13.1% in urban districts, Redfin figures show.


In many cases, the most densely populated cities have suffered sharper price declines or very modest increases because of higher contagion risk, according or a Natixis analysis.


“There’s a bifurcation,” Ludtka says. “People are less likely to purchase homes in areas where they may get sick.”


Among 20 cities in the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller’s composite price index, 11 fell short of the 2.9% national price gain from March through July (the most recent data available) while nine topped that increase. New York and San Francisco, the two most crowded cities – at 28,000 and 19,000 residents per square mile, respectively – were most affected by depressed prices, the Natixis analysis shows.


In New York, prices fell for three straight months and were down 0.3% in July from March levels, Natixis figures show. In San Francisco, prices dipped in two of the most recent three months prices and were up less than 1% since March.


Among other underperformers, prices edged up 1.5% in Miami (ranked fourth in density), 2.4% in Chicago (ranked fifth), 2.6% in Los Angeles (ranked 10th), and 2.6% in Washington, D.C. (ranked seventh).

Other measures show even sharper price declines in some areas. Median prices in Manhattan tumbled from $1.7 million in February to $1.2 million in June, according to ATTOM Data Solutions, a real estate research firm.


Meanwhile, less tightly-packed cities fared better than average. From March to July, prices increased 4% in Phoenix (ranked 34th), 3.2% in San Diego (ranked 23rd), and 3.4% in Charlotte (ranked 37th), according to the Natixis data.


“Some of the most popular places to buy a home are in the suburban outlying areas of major cities,” says Daryl Fairweather, Redfin’s chief economist.


Not every crowded city is seeing home prices suffer because of the pandemic and not all cities with more elbow room are prospering, the study shows, since other factors such as an area’s economy may loom larger, Ludtka says.


Boston home prices, for example, were up 3.1% in the March-July period, though the city ranks third in population density. And prices have increased just 1.8% in Tampa even though the city is a relatively low 46th in density.


But there’s little doubt that the pandemic has upended the real estate market.

In New York, condo and co-op sales had just started to recover in January after the 2017 tax code changes, which curtailed deductions for expensive homes, held down activity, says Martin Freiman, a Redfin broker. Since the crisis began, however, Redfin is handling about 600 sales a month in Manhattan, down from about 1,100 pre-pandemic, and prices have been reduced an average of about 10%, Freiman says.

“Everybody just left the city en masse,” he says. “People just stopped buying homes…You have an open house and no one shows up.”


If companies such as Facebook and Google return to their New York offices to some extent by next spring, Freiman foresees young professionals helping rejuvenate the market. But another fertile buyer segment – empty-nesters looking to patronize Broadway and other city amenities – may be diminished long-term, with older Americans more vulnerable to COVID-19.

 

           


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies January 22, 2025
A dedicated aging in place (AIP) program offered by the Oswego County Habitat for Humanity (OCHFH) in New York says it is seeing success by incorporating family, community and local resources to ensure older homeowners can remain where they prefer. “It’s been projected that, over the next 20 years, households led by individuals in their 80s will become the fastest growing age group , which provides stability within their communities,” said Samuel Raponi, OCHFH executive director. Through the organization’s AIP program, Habitat collaborates with families, local organizations and other community members in an effort to provide homes that prioritize living for older adults, he said. “This ultimately enhances their quality of life. We employ two different assessments in each case to ensure that the homeowners’ needs are clearly understood,” he added. An initial assessment of the client’s living situation aims to assess each person’s daily living activities, which are scrutinized by a “health or human services professional,” the organization said. This includes how they manage regular tasks like cleaning, shopping, paying bills or interacting with their community. A second evaluation specifically assesses home repair needs, and how to make a dwelling more livable for the needs of an older person. “These assessments enable OCHFH to provide modifications to their homes tailored to each homeowner’s specific lifestyle,” Raponi added. “Among the kinds of modifications we make are installing lever door handles, ramps, railings, grab bars, walk-in showers with a low threshold, and raised toilets to make homes more accessible for older adults.” Other resources, including Meals on Wheels , may be seen as necessary to deploy depending on a person’s circumstances, and all combine into a living situation that is aimed at being more generally beneficial for someone seeking to age in their own home. AIP is actively seeking more collaborative partners in the health care sector, owing to unique challenges visited upon older people who may not be able to adequately address their health needs. “Low-income older adults face a higher risk of chronic diseases and disabilities due to limited access to primary care and a greater likelihood of living in substandard, deteriorating housing,” Raponi added. A recent study from Carewell suggested that many older adults see aging in place as a financial necessity considering the costs of other kinds of living arrangements older people may choose. Nearly half of respondents (47%) characterized aging in place as both a preference and a financial necessity in tandem. 
By Didier Malagies January 20, 2025
1. Assess Your Financial Health Credit Score: Check your credit score (usually 620 or higher is required, though higher scores get better rates). Debt-to-Income Ratio (DTI): Calculate your monthly debt payments compared to your gross monthly income (lenders typically prefer a DTI below 43%). Savings: Ensure you have enough for a down payment (typically 3-20%) and closing costs. 2. Gather Financial Information Lenders will need the following: Proof of income (pay stubs, tax returns, W-2s/1099s). List of assets (savings, investments, retirement accounts). Details of current debts (credit card balances, student loans, etc.). 3. Choose a Lender Research different lenders, including banks, credit unions, and online lenders. Compare prequalification options (many allow online applications). 4. Complete the Prequalification Process Fill out the lender’s prequalification form (online, over the phone, or in person). Provide basic details about your income, debts, and assets. 5. Review Prequalification Results The lender will give you an estimate of the loan amount and potential interest rate. Remember, prequalification is not a guarantee of approval and doesn’t involve a hard credit inquiry. 6. Follow Up with Preapproval If you’re serious about buying, consider getting preapproved, which involves a more in-depth review and is stronger than prequalification. Tips: Use online calculators to estimate affordability before reaching out to lenders. Avoid large purchases or opening new lines of credit during the prequalification and preapproval process. Would you like details on specific lenders or tools to compare mortgage options? tune in and learn at https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
By Didier Malagies January 13, 2025
Many retirees have said they rely largely — and sometimes entirely — on Social Security benefits as their primary income stream in retirement . But in instances where these payments may not be enough to make ends meet, other options should be considered — and in the right situation, a reverse mortgage could be one such option.  That’s according to a column published this week by USA Today , which assessed reverse mortgages in tandem with options such as personal savings, a part-time job and other benefits programs. “A reverse mortgage is a possibility for seniors with substantial equity in their homes,” the column stated. “It essentially enables you to borrow against your equity, and you aren’t required to make any payments while you’re still alive as long as you live in the house.” The column is likely referencing the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage ( HECM ) program insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). Loan proceeds are dependent on the amount of equity in the home and current interest rates, the column noted, and there are multiple disbursement options available, the column noted. The minimum age requirement of 62, a core tenet of the HECM program, was also mentioned. “There are closing costs and other fees, and you’ll still be responsible for maintaining the property and paying the property taxes and homeowners insurance,” the column noted. It characterized the loan as a “solid option” for those who have few other assets beyond their homes, adding that “it might not be the right move if you intend to pass the property on to your heirs someday. After you pass away or move out of the home, you or your estate will have to repay the loan. This will reduce how much your heirs receive.” Recent survey data from Clever Real Estate highlighted some realities of relying on Social Security benefits in retirement. Roughly one in five respondents in the 1,000-person survey said they rely exclusively on Social Security benefits as their sole income stream in retirement, with nearly 30% saying they believed they would be able to rely on them. Last year, data from Nationwide suggested that an increasing number of older investors believe that retiring at the age of 65 is no longer a realistic option . This is largely tied to higher levels of stress they’re feeling about the economy and the cost of living.
Show More
Share by: