Blog Layout

The empire strikes back on lower mortgage rates Fed Governor Waller makes it clear that lower mortgage rates won't be tolerated

DDA Mortgage • November 14, 2022


After last week’s enormous bond and stock rally, I wondered when the Federal Reserve would make a statement to try to reverse some of that momentum. Well, it didn’t take long: on Sunday Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller made comments at an economic conference in Australia that made their position clear.


This is the second time this year that the Fed empire has struck back after mortgage rates made a move lower. Currently, the 10-year yield has made a reversal and is already heading higher toward 3.90%.


Here are some of the comments Waller made, according to tweets of Nick Timiraos of the Wall Street Journal:


“The market seemed to get waaaa-aaaay out in front…. I just cannot stress this is one data point.”

“We’ve still got a ways to go.”


The Federal Reserve is very upset with the market’s reaction; they know housing is in a recession and jobs are being lost. If mortgage rates started to go toward 5% and stay there, their job-loss recession forecast would be harder to obtain next year. Note the language use of “waaaa-aaay out in front.”


I understand that last week’s market rally in stocks and bonds was extreme — I believe people were on the other side of the trade, thinking that the CPI report would be hotter than average. People got out of that trade when that didn’t happen, and the markets ran with it.


However, the Fed doesn’t think that way. They were very upset about mortgage rates heading lower earlier in the summer, and they will do their best to create more pain for American households.


Timiraos further tweets:Waller on loosening of financial conditions that followed Thursday’s market reaction: “This is exactly the situation we had gotten into in July.” Back then, there was “A loosening of financial conditions that we were trying not to do.” 7.7% CPI Inflation “is enormous.”


In July, mortgage rates fell from 6.25% to 5%; housing found some stabilizing for the brief period when we were in the lows 5s and the Federal Reserve members hated it. They went on a full media blitz making sure people knew they were not kidding around that Americans needed more pain, the labor market was too tight, and wage growth was too strong.


The Fed, to their credit, presented a united front on this, making their case that the best way to fight inflation is for Americans to lose their jobs and for labor markets to get so weak that wage growth slows.

It’s now November, but the Fed hasn’t changed its playbook: any chance of trying to avoid a recession or even attempting to reverse the housing recession will be met by a similar coordinated media blitz. This weekend is the second time the Fed has shown it was upset with the market move. However, this time mortgage rates went from 7.373% to 6.60% — far from the 5% level we saw earlier. 

Waller also made the point that If you use a Taylor-type policy rule, short-term interest rates aren’t that high. “We’re not that tight. Real rates are barely positive a year out.”


The Atlanta Fed defines the Taylor rule as “an equation John Taylor introduced in a 1993 paper that prescribes a value for the federal funds rate—the short-term interest rate targeted by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC)—based on the values of inflation and economic slack such as the output gap or unemployment gap. Since 1993, alternative versions of Taylor’s original equation have been used and called ‘simple (monetary) policy rules.'”


I won’t bore you with all the historical stock market and Taylor Rule references over the decades. However, it’s clear the Fed is saying ‘Listen, the Fed funds rate isn’t that high, so stop crying. We don’t care that housing is in a recession.’ That was the point of the housing reset statement.


As someone who has followed the markets since 1996, I have to say this is a clever way for Waller to talk to the markets. It shows that the Fed means what it says: they have a 4.4% unemployment rate forecast for next year, and they intend to use all their tools to make sure the labor market gets weaker and weaker.

From Timiraos: Waller: The FOMC statement in November was designed to signal a potential step down to 50 basis point. “We knew the markets were going to jump for joy.” So the Fed used Powell’s press conference to “drive the point home” that it’s the ultimate level for rates that matters.


I believe the Federal Reserve is getting closer and closer to the end of its Fed rate hike cycle, and they want the financial conditions to be as tight as possible to get the job-loss recession to happen. Once the job loss recession occurs, they have to be more accommodative because that is their dual mandate.


My target for the Fed pivot is when jobless claims get above 323,000 on the four-week moving average. At that level, the job-loss recession has started, and the Fed would have achieved its goal of getting their job loss recession to break inflation.


With inflation levels well above their 2% target level, the Fed has to sound as tough as possible now. All these aggresive push-backs by Feb members when rates go lower and stocks go higher will end when we have a job-loss recession.


From multiple sources: “Everybody should just take a deep breath, calm down — we have a ways to go yet.”


As you can see, the Fed isn’t happy about the move in the stock or mortgage markets. So when they say calm down, they’re saying, all that smoke about a soft landing — we don’t want a soft landing. If they did, they wouldn’t make such a big deal when mortgage rates fall, and stocks rise.


My advice: don’t buy the talk that the Fed wants a soft landing; they want a higher unemployment rate and will try to talk the market into higher rates and lower stock values when they feel the need to do so. As the saying goes, Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”


Breaking market news quoted Waller as saying: Housing markets in the U.S. will be fine.

The housing market went into recession in June of this year: sales were down, production was down, jobs were lost and incomes were lost. See, even with the housing market in a recession and jobs being lost, the Fed doesn’t care. To say a sector of the economy is fine while it’s in a downturn shows some disconnection from the real world.


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the Federal Reserve in its purest form when they say housing will be fine while it’s in a recession. If it were me, I would have at least acknowledged that the housing market is in a recession and jobs are being lost. Then after that statement, I would talk about how I believe that it’s critical for the housing market to get balance, which is occurring right now.



Not acknowledging that jobs are being lost in such a large sector of the economy makes you sound heartless and disconnected from reality.


After the big stock market rally on Thursday and noticeable drop in mortgage rates, I wondered if the Fed would make a statement to try to talk the markets back. The Fed did make their statements this weekend, so get used to this type of reaction from the Federal Reserve until the job-loss recession happens.




Have A Question?

Use the form below and we will give your our expert answers!

Reverse Mortgage Ask A Question


Start Your Loan with DDA today
Your local Mortgage Broker

Mortgage Broker Largo
See our Reviews

Looking for more details? Listen to our extended podcast! 

Check out our other helpful videos to learn more about credit and residential mortgages.

By Didier Malagies December 20, 2024
Older homeowners have an overwhelming preference to age in place , but these circumstances can also come with unique challenges. Feelings of isolation and loneliness rank highly among these issues, but a recent study suggests that aging in place with a pet can make a big difference. The study, highlighted in Psychology Today , also noted that having pets in later life can come with its own set of unique challenges , according to Ann Toohey, one of the authors of the study who is based at the University of Calgary. The study followed initial interviews conducted in 2015 by examining how owning a pet impacted the lives of older people aging in place in their homes. According to the study, several takeaways emerged, including that the companionship of a pet makes a difference in their owners’ lives. While the companionship provided is understandably different from what is offered by another person, it also came with other potential social benefits for the seniors who owned pets. “As it happened, most of the people in this study were single,” the report in Psychology Today noted. “Having a dog, in particular, was a good way to get to know other people, so pets could also increase the size of participants’ social networks.” Finding pet-friendly housing can be an issue, according to the respondents. While the subjects were committed to keeping their pets, the housing challenges that pets can present made for a unique challenge. “Because people did not want to give up their pets, they sometimes had to accept housing that was less than ideal or even not safe due to other people in the home,” the report explained. Pets can also have other impacts on an older person’s mental well being, the study found, particularly if an older pet owner endured certain health-related challenges. “As people got older, they sometimes had difficult circumstances to deal with, such as serious issues with their own health,” the report said. “Caring for their pet provided meaning through these hard times, and a sense of things continuing to be the same, at least in some regards. In this way, the pet helped them to cope with the challenges.” Toohey added that while the seniors profiled in the study were generally committed to keeping their pets, the potential housing challenges that pet ownership can present for some older people seeking housing need to be addressed. There is a lot of potential for what she calls “companion animal relationships” to promote health in “many ways that are salient to aging.” These include spurring physical activity by walking a pet, companionship and potential involvement in pet-centric social activities with other pet owners. But certain challenges are also a factor, including the cost of pet supplies, a lack of affordable support if a pet owner becomes ill, and the need for veterinary care. There are also housing-related challenges, which could include “the prevalence of no pet rules to size restrictions to extra fees,” she said. In terms of housing policies tied to aging in place, these barriers could have the most impact, according to the report. “Greater availability of seniors’ housing that allows pets would be very beneficial and would make it easier for people to age in place with their pet,” the report said. “This would benefit those who aren’t seniors too, as more pet-friendly housing would help a wide range of people.”  This is on top of other well-documented challenges older people can face when trying to age in place. These include the high cost of long-term care , a need to create more walkable communities and housing supply illus trates that impact prospective homebuyers of all ages.
By Didier Malagies December 17, 2024
Older homeowners have an overwhelming preference to age in place , but these circumstances can also come with unique challenges. Feelings of isolation and loneliness rank highly among these issues, but a recent study suggests that aging in place with a pet can make a big difference. The study, highlighted in Psychology Today , also noted that having pets in later life can come with its own set of unique challenges , according to Ann Toohey, one of the authors of the study who is based at the University of Calgary. The study followed initial interviews conducted in 2015 by examining how owning a pet impacted the lives of older people aging in place in their homes. According to the study, several takeaways emerged, including that the companionship of a pet makes a difference in their owners’ lives. While the companionship provided is understandably different from what is offered by another person, it also came with other potential social benefits for the seniors who owned pets. “As it happened, most of the people in this study were single,” the report in Psychology Today noted. “Having a dog, in particular, was a good way to get to know other people, so pets could also increase the size of participants’ social networks.” Finding pet-friendly housing can be an issue, according to the respondents. While the subjects were committed to keeping their pets, the housing challenges that pets can present made for a unique challenge. “Because people did not want to give up their pets, they sometimes had to accept housing that was less than ideal or even not safe due to other people in the home,” the report explained. Pets can also have other impacts on an older person’s mental well being, the study found, particularly if an older pet owner endured certain health-related challenges. “As people got older, they sometimes had difficult circumstances to deal with, such as serious issues with their own health,” the report said. “Caring for their pet provided meaning through these hard times, and a sense of things continuing to be the same, at least in some regards. In this way, the pet helped them to cope with the challenges.” Toohey added that while the seniors profiled in the study were generally committed to keeping their pets, the potential housing challenges that pet ownership can present for some older people seeking housing need to be addressed. There is a lot of potential for what she calls “companion animal relationships” to promote health in “many ways that are salient to aging.” These include spurring physical activity by walking a pet, companionship and potential involvement in pet-centric social activities with other pet owners. But certain challenges are also a factor, including the cost of pet supplies, a lack of affordable support if a pet owner becomes ill, and the need for veterinary care. There are also housing-related challenges, which could include “the prevalence of no pet rules to size restrictions to extra fees,” she said. In terms of housing policies tied to aging in place, these barriers could have the most impact, according to the report. “Greater availability of seniors’ housing that allows pets would be very beneficial and would make it easier for people to age in place with their pet,” the report said. “This would benefit those who aren’t seniors too, as more pet-friendly housing would help a wide range of people.”  This is on top of other well-documented challenges older people can face when trying to age in place. These include the high cost of long-term care , a need to create more walkable communities and housing supply illus trates that impact prospective homebuyers of all ages.
By Didier Malagies December 16, 2024
A condo questionnaire is a critical document that lenders use during the mortgage approval process for condominium purchases. It provides detailed information about the condo complex's financial health, rules, regulations, and overall condition. Problems with the condo questionnaire can create delays or complications during the closing process. Here are some common issues that might cause problems: 1. Financial Health Concerns High percentage of owner-occupancy: Many lenders require that at least 50% (or more) of the units in the complex be owner-occupied rather than rented. If a condo complex has too many renters, it could impact the lender’s willingness to approve a loan. Reserve fund issues: Lenders typically want to see that the condo association has sufficient funds in its reserve account for future maintenance and emergencies. If the reserve fund is too low or non-existent, it raises concerns about the financial stability of the association, leading to potential loan rejection. Delinquencies in condo fees: A high rate of delinquencies in the condo association fees can signal financial instability, which lenders may view as a risk. This can delay or halt the approval process. 2. Insurance Coverage Problems Lack of adequate insurance: Lenders require that the condo association carries specific types of insurance, including property insurance and liability coverage. If the condo association's insurance policy doesn’t meet the lender's criteria, the loan may be delayed or denied. Insufficient flood insurance: If the condo is in a flood zone, the association is required to have flood insurance. A deficiency in this area can cause significant issues with closing. 3. Pending or Recent Litigation Ongoing lawsuits: If the condo association is involved in a lawsuit (e.g., against contractors, residents, or local authorities), it can be a red flag for lenders. Lawsuits can create financial and legal uncertainty, so lenders may hesitate to approve a loan until the matter is resolved. History of litigation: Even if the condo association is not currently involved in litigation, a history of legal problems could still concern lenders and complicate the approval process. 4. Non-Compliance with Condominium Guidelines Failure to meet FHA/VA guidelines: Some buyers are using FHA or VA loans, which have specific guidelines regarding condo developments. If the condo does not meet these criteria (for example, not having enough unit owners, or a commercial component taking up too much space), it can prevent the buyer from securing the loan. Non-compliant rules or by-laws: If the condo association's rules or by-laws are outdated or do not comply with lender requirements (such as restrictions on renting out units), it can create issues. 5. Discrepancies or Incomplete Information Incomplete or missing information: If the condo questionnaire is not fully completed or there is missing information about the financials or maintenance issues, lenders may hold up the approval process. Incorrect or inconsistent data: Discrepancies between the information provided in the questionnaire and the condo association’s financial statements can raise red flags, requiring additional clarification or investigation. 6. Excessive Commercial Units or Mixed-Use Properties High commercial occupancy: If a condo development has a high percentage of commercial space or mixed-use properties (residential and commercial), lenders might view this as risky. Lenders prefer predominantly residential complexes since they have a lower risk profile. 7. Special Assessments Upcoming or recent special assessments: If the condo association has recently passed a special assessment (a fee charged to condo owners for unexpected repairs or improvements) or plans to do so in the near future, it can lead to concerns about the financial health of the complex and may affect the lender's decision to approve the loan. 8. Age of the Building Older buildings with deferred maintenance: Lenders might be cautious about approving loans for condos in older buildings that have not been well-maintained. They may require detailed maintenance records or a building inspection to ensure that the property is in good condition. Conclusion Issues with the condo questionnaire that could cause problems during closing typically revolve around the financial stability, legal status, and physical condition of the condo association and its property. It's important for both the buyer and the seller to address these issues early in the process by working with the condo association to provide accurate, complete, and compliant documentation to the lender. By messaging ChatGPT, you agree to our Terms and have read our Privacy Policy. Don't share sensitive info. Chats may be reviewed and used to train our models. Learn more tune in and learn at https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog didier malagies nmls#212566 dda mortgage nmls#324329
Show More
Share by: